Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy

ISSN 2196-5625 CN 32-1884/TK

网刊加载中。。。

使用Chrome浏览器效果最佳,继续浏览,你可能不会看到最佳的展示效果,

确定继续浏览么?

复制成功,请在其他浏览器进行阅读

Integrated Distribution Management System: Architecture, Functions, and Application in China  PDF

  • Wenchuan Wu
  • Penghua Li
  • Bin Wang
  • Yingshang Liu
  • Tao Xu
  • Hongwei Du
  • Yan He
State Key Laboratory of Power Systems, Department of Electrical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; Electric Power Control Center of China Southern Power Grid Corporation, Guangzhou, China; National Electric Power Control Center of State Grid Corporation of China, Beijing, China; NARI Technology Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China; Beijing Guoke Hengtong Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China

Updated:2022-03-28

DOI:10.35833/MPCE.2021.000600

  • Full Text
  • Figs & Tabs
  • References
  • Authors
  • About
CITE
OUTLINE

Abstract

As massive distributed energy resources (DERs) are integrated into distribution networks (DNs) and the distribution automation facilities are widely deployed, the DNs are evolving to active distribution networks (ADNs). This paper introduces the architecture and main function modules of an integrated distribution management system (IDMS) and its applications in China. This system consists of three subsystems, including the real-time operation and control system (OCS), outage management system (OMS), and operator training simulator (OTS). The OCS has a hierarchical architecture with three levels, including the local controller for DER clusters, the optimization of DNs incorporated with multi-clusters, and the coordination operation of integrated transmission & distribution (T&D) networks. The OMS is developed based on the geographical information system (GIS) and coordinated with OCS. While in the OTS, both the ADN and its host transmission network (TN) are simulated to make the simulation results more credible. The main functions of the three subsystems and their interaction data flows are described and some typical application scenarios are also presented.

I. Introduction

RENEWABLE energy sources are being integrated into distribution networks (DNs) at a fast rate, pushed by policies and the environmental pressure [

1], [2]. The volatility of renewable energy power generation, the lack of active control, and the absence of rotational inertia pose great challenges to power system operation [3]. The techniques of active distribution networks (ADNs) are indispensable for complex DNs integrated with renewable energies. According to the definition of CIGREC 6.11 working group, the ADN refers to the DN that realizes the controllability of distributed energy resources (DERs) and energy storage system (ESS) as well as the optimal operation of the networks, and it enables the DERs to provide system auxiliary services to a certain extent [4].

In the 1980s and 1990s, various functions and architectures of energy management system (EMS) for transmission networks (TNs) have been fully investigated [

5]-[8]. The distribution management system (DMS) is a fundamental facility in electric power control center to realize the optimal operation of DNs. It adopts real-time control and communication techniques to better manage the connected power supply, ESS, and load [9]. ABB [10], SIEMENS [11], [12], GE, ASC, etc. all have related DMS products, which mainly implement the functions of supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system [13], including data acquisition, fault alarm, dynamic network coloring, and reporting. Resort to the big data, an advanced situation awareness (SA) system [14] is developed to online evaluate the operation states and potential risks. However, in general, it is still stuck in the functions of data collection and monitoring of DNs.

There are some research works on developing ADN techniques. A state estimation solution for ADNs using the Hamiltonian cycle theory is presented in [

15]. A data-driven robust multi-period distribution optimal power flow (OPF) model is described in [16] for the dispatch of flexible resources with uncertainty. Reference [17] presents a risk-based AC OPF approach to improve the consumption of wind power and simultaneously manage the congestion and voltages. Reference [18] develops an active response methodology using shared ESS for the household energy management. Energy sources and EMSs for electric vehicles (EVs) are reviewed in [19]. The techniques of conservation voltage reduction and demand response are integrated into DMS in [20] for harnessing the energy efficiency. A measurement-based fault location scheme considering the bi-directional power flow of ADNs is proposed in [21]. In [22], models are developed for forecasting the load profile and DG behaviors using recorded measurements. Active management strategies are proposed in [23]-[25], considering the coordination of DERs and EVs. In summary, many active management functions such as state estimation, OPF, demand response, fault analysis, etc. are gradually developed and verified.

Some pioneer works have been conducted to design and implement DMSs. The architectural design of Korean Smart Distribution Management System (KSDMS) is introduced in [

26], including the solution process, telecommunication systems, feeder intelligent devices, and server systems. In [27], an advanced distribution management system (ADMS) is implemented, whose functions include protection, state estimation, and real-time hierarchical optimization. A distributed energy management framework coordinated with the demand-side and supply-side management systems is introduced in [28] for the efficient utilization of photovoltaic (PV) generation. An ADMS proposed by Schneider Electric SA [29] consists of a comprehensive set of tools including the SCADA for remote control and monitoring, the outage management system (OMS) for managing outage events, and the DMS with a broad collection of advanced power applications for visualization, planning, monitoring, control, and overall management of the DN. This system has been deployed in the power grid of Somme and Cambraisic regions in France.

In China, more than 80% of the power outages are caused by incidents in the DNs, and over 70% of the network losses also occur in the DNs. Due to the large-scale and complex terrain of the DN, the requirements and workload for fault diagnosis and recovery are different from those of the TN. Compared with the traditional DN, the ADN contains more elements, the structure is more complex, and the interrelationship between its elements is more complicated [

30], [31]. While the number of DN operators or management staffs is larger, and their professional qualities and technical capabilities are weaker, more detailed and reasonable simulation training of ADN is needed. An intelligent platform is needed to provide the support of multi-level active management, rush repair and recovery of power outages, and collaborative simulation of transmission & distribution (T&D) networks [30], [32], [33].

Due to the particularity of DNs, the traditional operation and control system (OCS) meets the following challenges [

9].

1) Massive controllable entities: the large-scale DERs and the controllable loads and networks lead to a sharp rise in the amount of information collected. Due to the bottleneck of communication and information processing, it is impossible to send all information to the control center for centralized decision-making.

2) Model maintenance efforts: ADN has a large number of components and frequent changes, and it is difficult for the control center to maintain the model of DNs in a timely and accurate manner.

3) Agility problems: renewable energy generation has strong fluctuations and rapid changes, and the long time delay in the control process hinders it to meet the requirements of real-time operation.

4) System reliability: the centralized system has the single-point failure issue, i.e., if the central server fails, the whole system will stop working. Therefore, such system is fragile.

5) Information privacy: DERs belong to different stakeholders, and the centralized system may not be able to access the detailed information of various entities.

In addition, the scale of DN is much larger than that of the TN, and is mainly maintained in the geographic information system (GIS) and product management system (PMS). The real-time or quasi-real-time measurements are generated from distribution automation devices, DERs, customers meters, and trouble calls, and thus a tremendous amount of information is involved [

34]. The frequent updating and switching operations of DN also produce a large number of changes in topology. During the fault detection, isolation, and recovery, the geographical information and remote sensing images are essential for operators to make decisions. Meanwhile, the fault isolation and recovery processes cannot be fully automated [34]. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a quicker and wiser OMS with the ability of large-scale processing and visualization of massive data.

The T&D networks have significant differences in voltage levels, network topologies, and impedance properties, and they are managed by different control centers, but their electrical coupling greatly affects each other. The traditional operator training simulator (OTS) of the TN can no longer be handled in an adequate way due to the increasing interdependencies with the systems such as TNs, DNs, DERs, and EVs. Therefore, a more comprehensive OTS is necessary to simulate the system interdependencies and determine the appropriate control strategies for optimizing power system operation [

35], to provide more real and useful training experiences for operators.

The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. Section II introduces the overall architecture of integrated distribution management system (IDMS). The specific functions and key technologies of OCS, OMS, and OTS are described in Sections III, IV, and V, respectively. Section VI presents several pilot projects and some results from real applications of the IDMS. The conclusion and prospects are provided in Section VII.

II. Overall Architecture of IDMS

IDMS is a distribution management platform for ADN that is composed of multiple subsystems. The system follows a layered software design and development strategy. Combining the intelligent analysis and decision-making technology based on full-phase model and the visual development of advanced analysis based on real-time GIS platform, an intelligent integrated application system of DN is formed. As shown in Fig. 1, its data sources mainly include GIS-based unified network modeling, feeder terminal unit (FTU), distribution terminal unit (DTU), transformer terminal unit (TTU), advanced metering infrastructure (AMI), customer information system (CIS), PMS, etc.

Fig. 1  Architecture of IDMS.

The OCS is a multi-level, autonomous, and coordinated active management system. Its core is “cluster schedule and control”, which means each cluster governs its own state separately, and the superior coordination layers take clusters as the control object for regulation. Its main functions consist of dynamic autonomous control of DER clusters, optimization of the ADNs incorporated with multi-clusters, and coordinated optimization of integrated T&D networks.

The OMS is a fault repair and recovery system, which efficiently manages planned and unplanned power outages in ADNs. Its functions mainly include fault analysis and judgment, power outage analysis, work order management, visual comprehensive display, statistical analysis, mobile application (APP), etc.

The OTS simulates various normal and fault conditions of the ADN considering the coordination of T&D networks. Its main functions involve the ADN model, network analysis, joint anti-accident exercise, operator research, and monitoring simulation, etc.

The three subsystems do not exist in the isolated mode, but coordinate with each other in an integrated manner. As shown in Fig. 2, the OCS performs real-time calculations, displays the real-time operation status of the system, and provides real-time calculation results for other subsystems. It is mainly used for real-time control and online scheduling by operators. The required model and topology information are maintained in the GIS-based OMS. The real-time data requirement of OMS is transferred from OCS periodically. The OTS uses the snapshot of the data and models of the OCS and OMS for offline training of operators.

Fig. 2  Interaction among OCS, OMS, and OTS.

For example, when the OMS generates control strategies to deal with faults, it is based on the relevant real-time calculation results of OCS, and the operation simulations under the normal and fault conditions are carried out in the OTS according to the relevant data and models of OCS and OMS.

III. Real-time OCS

The traditional centralized control and decision-making systems face technical challenges such as control agility, system reliability, massive communication, and information privacy etc., which promotes the transformation of the centralized DMS architecture to hierarchical distributed architecture.

The OCS has a hierarchical architecture including local cluster control, ADN optimization, and coordination of T&D networks. The cluster control can facilitate the integration of DERs into the grid and realize “cluster self-discipline”. The optimization layer of DN aims to coordinate the clusters for accommodating the uncertainties of DERs. The coordination of layers in T&D networks fully exploits the regulation capability of the whole networks to realize the efficient and safe operation of DNs.

As shown in Fig. 3, the lowest layer composed of local cluster controllers dynamically controls the DERs inside the clusters and tracks the control objectives issued by the upper-level. The lowest layer is on a second time scale. The autonomous controller can mitigate local voltage violations caused by DERs and load fluctuations, and provide frequency modulation and dynamic voltage regulation services when necessary. As shown in Fig. 4, the DER clusters participate in system scheduling via providing an equivalent aggregation flexibility model represented by a high-dimensional polytope [

36]. Inside the cluster, a multi-agent-based distributed control architecture for cluster illustrated in Fig. 5 is adopted to achieve the agility and reliability of control in few pilot projects.

Fig. 3  Framework of OCS.

Fig. 4  Coordination and regulation framework of cluster based on dynamic equivalence.

Fig. 5  Multi-agent-based distributed control architecture for cluster.

The middle layer is the ADN optimization, which realizes the complementary and coordinated optimization of the regional clusters and other flexible resources.

Therefore, it plays a critical role in the OCS. It needs to respond to the control instructions of the top layer as well as calculate and report the regional regulation capability. Moreover, it optimizes the operation of ADNs incorporated with multi-clusters. This layer is on a minute time scale, and it can improve the efficiency and security of the ADNs through coordinating clusters.

The top layer of OCS is the coordination of T&D networks. It is on a 10-min time scale. The joint regulation of the T&D networks is realized through a decomposition and coordination algorithm, on the premise of ensuring the independence operation of the TN and ADN. Besides, the distributed scheme solves the issues of numerical stability and regulation dependence in the conventional centralized solutions.

This hierarchical OCS has a flexible and scalable framework. It can realize the fast control of DERs through local cluster controllers and global optimization by adopting the decomposition and coordination solution. Owing to the hierarchical structure, the information privacy is preserved in the IDMS. The dynamic control of DERs is achieved inside the cluster layer, and the cluster controller provides its equivalent aggregation flexibility to the upper layers, masking the detailed model information. In addition, the computation burden of OCS is not very heavy since the DERs are aggregated into several equivalent cluster models, and the fast control is realized at low cluster level.

This operation and control framework is also applicable for DERs participating in electricity market. In the market setting, the cluster is evolved to virtual power plant (VPP), in which all the DERs can be aggregated as a whole and participate in market bidding. Therefore, the cluster controller takes the responsibility of de-aggregating the market clearing results for the cluster and optimizing the operation of DERs [

37]. In China, there is no distribution retail market at present. The demonstration applications have been realized in a transmission power grid with centralized, i.e., locational marginal price (LMP) based, power trading [38].

The key technologies and detailed models of OCS mainly involve: ① ADN analysis technology [

39], [40]; ② distributed cluster regulation technology [41], [42]; ③ coordination and optimization technology of active and reactive power for ADN considering uncertainty [43], [44]; and ④ distributed coordinated optimization of T&D networks [45], [46].

IV. OMS

Since DN has a huge number of components, the computation burden of OMS is very heavy. The OMS in IDMS adopts distributed computation platform that distributes tasks to computer clusters. The distributed SCADA (DSCADA) provides real-time data access and distributed real-time data processing for multiple computers, realizes the localization of calculations and data, and better supports different calculation modes such as distributed batches and memory calculations, as shown in Fig. 6. The techniques of distributed storage and multi-machine concurrent processing make the DSCADA scalable for processing real-time measurements of large-scale DNs.

Fig. 6  Architecture of DSCADA.

The information fusion technology is used for fault analysis in the OMS. After the fusion analysis and processing, it can figure out whether there is a fault and find the fault location. Since the data from different sources are adopted, the creditability of fault analysis results can be improved. In addition, a real-time GIS platform is developed. It supports thousands of concurrent service processing per second, and supports hundreds of power grid model updates every day. It realizes the dynamic display of different states of ADNs as well as that of network analysis results.

A typical fault handling process is shown in Fig. 7, including the following four parts: ① intelligent fault analysis and location; ② automatic trigger process, where operators 1-3 carry out the patrol inspection, do the rush repair work, and verify the switch and protection information in the station, respectively; ③ command center of fault repair and recovery; and ④ quick response to consumers’ inquiry.

Fig. 7  Flowchart of fault handling procedures.

Based on the above technology and the data sources of IDMS, the OMS uses the topology analysis and system simulation to automatically determine the fault type, location, and outage area, and correct them according to trouble calls. After the fault diagnosis, the repair and recovery process is automatically triggered, and the work order is formed and dispatched. Then, the inspection and repair will be carried out. The fault judgment results, outage information, repair, and recovery progress, etc. are all displayed synchronously in real time, so that service staffs can quickly respond to users.

The OMS preliminarily realizes the visualization of operation state of a large number of ADN equipment, operation process, and decision-making ideas [

47], [48].

In a multi-level scheduling system, the OMS can be deployed in a hybrid centralized and distributed manner.

As shown in Fig. 8, the centralized one is deployed in the provincial control centers, and the distributed ones are deployed in the local district control centers.

Fig. 8  Multi-level coordination structure of OMS.

The provincial control center makes the maintenance plan and fault repair schedule, which needs to interact with 6 systems. In the district control center, the intelligent fault diagnosis module is locally deployed for real-time decision-making. And the local control centers synchronize the diagnosis results to the provincial control center.

The key technologies of OMS mainly include: ① automatic fault diagnosis and location; ② optimal scheduling of repair resources and path; ③ multi-service integration and application integration; and ④ visualization techniques.

V. OTS

The OTS provides an application and operation environment consistent with the real-time ADN. The conceptual diagram of OTS is shown in Fig. 9. The left half of the figure is the “mirror system” of the actual ADN system. The OTS shares the existing ADN parameters and screens in the IDMS system with OCS and OMS.

Fig. 9  Conceptual diagram of OTS.

The main functions of OTS include [

49]:

1) Power grid simulation: it includes steady state and fault simulation of primary and secondary systems.

2) Power grid analysis: based on historical and real-time network models incorporated with DERs, various analysis functions are realized, including power flow analysis, fault analysis, protective relay analysis, contingency with automatic restoration analysis, accident check analysis, etc.

3) Training and joint anti-accident exercise: ① training on power grid operation and accident handling; ② combining superior and subordinate OTSs to realize joint simulation training and anti-accident exercise of T&D networks.

4) Operation schedule and corrective control simulation: all the operation and corrective control actions are simulated under normal and contingency conditions.

5) Monitoring simulation: ① all on-site events should be recorded; ② various alarms, protection actions, and operation information are divided according to different emergency degrees.

OTS can also realize the joint simulation of T&D networks. The corresponding TN and DN simulation modules are maintained and performed separately. The simulation of the integrated T&D networks is realized through the mutual tracking and matching of boundary power flow. In addition, the simulated fault information and the action status of primary and secondary equipment are transmitted to each simulation module, which can realize joint simulation. The data interaction process for joint simulation of T&D networks is shown in Fig. 10.

Fig. 10  Data interaction process for co-simulation of T&D networks.

VI. Application Scenarios

Sections II-V introduce the main architecture and functional modules of IDMS. This section briefly describes some typical application scenarios.

A. OCS Application

A demonstration project includes eight 110 kV substations, ten 35 kV substations, and 174 feeders subordinate to these substations. According to the network topology and controllable resource allocation, the demonstration network is divided into six clusters, as shown in Fig. 11, where the hydropower, biomass, wind power, and PV account for 17%, 10%, 28%, and 45%, respectively.

Fig. 11  Layout of clusters in demonstration network.

The detailed information of Cluster 1 is shown in Fig. 12, which includes 15 breakers, 900 kWh ESS and 580 kW PVs to be controlled.

Fig. 12  Detailed information of Cluster 1 in demonstration project.

The function configuration of OCS is shown in Fig. 13, which has a hierarchical control architecture.

Fig. 13  Function configuration of OCS.

Resorting to this control system, the power loss and voltage deviation of the whole network have been reduced, and the operation efficiency of the ADN is improved significantly.

Considering the participation of DERs in electricity market as VPPs, the OCS is developed to a more complicated system incorporated with the power market support system, in which the bidding and clearing of energy trading and ancillary services are realized, as shown in Fig. 14 [

37].

Fig. 14  Operation and coordination of VPP with power grid.

B. OMS Application

The OMS has been widely deployed in China. Figure 15 shows a typical man machine interfaces (MMIs) of the fault analysis and location module. The troubleshooting is a process of cooperation of multiple subsystems and different staffs.

Fig. 15  MMIs of failure analysis and location module.

The left interface is customer service fault location. When a fault is detected or a trouble call is received in the control center, the fault diagnosis is figured out automatically, and the fault location is determined based on the Internet geographic maps. Meanwhile, a work order with solutions is generated and dispatched to the repair staffs of the substation near the fault. The above information will be presented on the duty-room in real time, as shown in the right interface. The operations on the left and right are interrelated, and information is sent to customer service center for users’ tracking.

A mobile APP of OMS realizes the information sharing and interaction of troubleshooting. The system operators, repair staffs, and other users can all follow the troubleshooting progress in real time. As shown in Appendix A Figs. A1-A4, with the APP, the real-time location, status, and trajectory of repair staffs are presented to the command center. The reported fault diagnosis and repeated work order filtering can be realized, and the progress of troubleshooting is shown to customer service center for timely reply to users. The overall progress from the command center to on-site work orders is displayed to the managers of all levels. The automatic transmission of work order information can be realized, which is convenient for repair staffs to contact users and navigate faults.

The OMS provides strong technical supports for network reconfiguration and uninterrupted switching operation during load transfer caused by equipment maintenance or contingencies. It can reduce the number of consumers affected by power outages and accelerate the power restoration process.

C. OTS Application

Currently, the OTS for DNs is mainly deployed in electric power training schools of State Grid Corporation of China.

Appendix A Figures A6-A8 shows some functional interfaces of OTS, including: ① the operation simulation of centralized master-station feeder automation system; ② the operation simulation of local feeder automation facilities; ③ the operation simulation and power flow analysis considering distributed renewable energy; and ④ the fault recovery control simulation.

It can truly reflect the changes in the power flow of the main grid and DN after a hypothetical accident occurs, and improve the emergence disposal ability and knowledges of operators.

VII. Conclusion and Future Work

This paper discusses the technical challenges of the ADN operation and proposes an integrated EMS consisting of OCS, OMS, and OTS. It introduces the main architecture, data sources, functional framework, and relationship of the three subsystems, and summarizes the key technologies. The demonstration applications show that the IDMS is well adapted to the operation characteristics of DNs with high penetration rate of DERs, and has a good prospect of popularization and application.

The flexibilities of prosumers connected to the end of DN have shown the potential to mitigate the variability of renewable energies [

50]. How to accurately evaluate and characterize the flexibility and exploit them in the IDMS is essential for the optimal operation of ADN [51], [52]. In addition, there are some critical technical issues to be solved in engineering applications such as model mismatch, insufficient real-time measurements, and identification of flexible resources. The reinforcement learning [53], [54] and online feedback optimization [55] are potential solutions for implementing the optimization of partially observable systems.

Appendix

Appendix A

Fig. A1  Mobile APP of OMS for fault repair and recovery: interface for command center.

Fig. A2  Mobile APP of OMS for fault repair and recovery: interface for customer service.

Fig. A3  Mobile APP of OMS for fault repair and recovery: interfaces for managers.

Fig. A4  Mobile APP of OMS for fault repair and recovery: interfaces for repair teams.

Fig. A5  Operation simulation of centralized master-station feeder automation system.

Fig. A6  Operation simulation of local feeder automation facilities.

Fig. A7  Operation simulation of distributed renewable generation.

Fig. A8  Fault recovery control simulation.

References

1

B. Mohandes, E. Moursi, M. Shawky et al., “A review of power system flexibility with high penetration of renewables,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 3140-3155, Jul. 2019. [Baidu Scholar

2

B. Mohandes, M. Wahbah, M. EMoursi et al., “Renewable energy management system: optimum design and hourly dispatch,” IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1615-1628, Jul. 2021. [Baidu Scholar

3

M. Caramanis, E. Ntakou, W. W. Hogan et al., “Co-optimization of power and reserves in dynamic T&D power markets with nondispatchable renewable generation and distributed energy resources,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 104, no. 4, pp. 807-836, Apr. 2016. [Baidu Scholar

4

C. D’Adamo, S. Jupe, and C. Abbey, “Global survey on planning and operation of active distribution networks” in Proceedings of 20th International Conference and Exhibition on Electricity Distribution, Prague, Czech Republic, Jun. 2009. [Baidu Scholar

5

Y. Hayashi, Y. Fujimoto, H. Ishii et al., “Versatile modeling platform for cooperative energy management systems in smart cities,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 594-612, Apr. 2018. [Baidu Scholar

6

B. Prince, A. Sasson, W. Wynne et al., “Advances in energy management systems,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. PWRS-1, no. 3, pp. 226-234, Aug. 1986. [Baidu Scholar

7

Y. B. Lee, R. Mitten, K.-C. Liu et al., “The China Light and Power Company energy management system,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 199-205, Feb. 1991. [Baidu Scholar

8

R. R. Shoults, M. S. Chen, and A. Domijan, “The energy systems research center electric power system simulation laboratory and energy management system control center,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 239-245, Feb. 1987. [Baidu Scholar

9

W. Wu, B. Zhang, H. Sun et al., “Energy management and distributed energy resources cluster control for active distribution networks”, Automation of Electric Power Systems, vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 111-118, May 2020. [Baidu Scholar

10

N. Singh, E. Kliokys, H. Feldmann et al., “Power system modelling and analysis in a mixed energy management and distribution management system,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1143-1149, Aug. 1998. [Baidu Scholar

11

R. Krebs, C. Heyde, and X. Liang, “Online stability assessment in control room environment,” in Proceedings of the 6th Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference, Shanghai, China, Apr. 2014, pp. 1-6. [Baidu Scholar

12

U Münz, M Metzger, A Szabo et al., “Overview of recent control technologies for future power systems,” Automatisierungstechnik, vol. 63, no. 11, pp. 869-882, Nov. 2015. [Baidu Scholar

13

D. Pliatsios, P. Sarigiannidis, T. Lagkas et al., “A survey on SCADA systems: secure protocols, incidents, threats and tactics,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 1942-1976, Sept. 2020. [Baidu Scholar

14

J. Lin, C. Wan, Y. Song et al., “Situation awareness of active distribution network: Roadmap, technologies, and bottlenecks,” CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 35-42, Sept. 2016. [Baidu Scholar

15

J. B. Leite and J. R. S. Mantovani, “Distribution system state estimation using the Hamiltonian cycle theory,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 366-375, Jan. 2016. [Baidu Scholar

16

F. Mancilla-David, A. Angulo, and A. Street, “Power management in active distribution systems penetrated by photovoltaic inverters: a data-driven robust approach,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 2271-2280, May 2020. [Baidu Scholar

17

S. W. Alnaser and L. F. Ochoa, “Advanced network management systems: a risk-based AC OPF approach,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 409-418, Jan. 2015. [Baidu Scholar

18

Z. Wang, C. Gu, F. Li et al., “Active demand response using shared energy storage for household energy management,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1888-1897, Dec. 2013. [Baidu Scholar

19

S. Tie and C. Tan, “A review of energy sources and energy management system in electric vehicles,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 20, pp. 82-102, Apr. 2013. [Baidu Scholar

20

M. S. Hossan and B. Chowdhury, “Integrated CVR and demand response framework for advanced distribution management systems,” IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 534-544, Jan. 2020. [Baidu Scholar

21

M. S. Hossan and B. Chowdhury, “Data-driven fault location scheme for advanced distribution management systems,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 5386-5396, Sept. 2019. [Baidu Scholar

22

B. P. Hayes and M. Prodanovic, “State forecasting and operational planning for distribution network energy management systems,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1002-1011, Mar. 2016. [Baidu Scholar

23

Z. Yang, Y. Li, and J. Xiang, “Coordination control strategy for power management of active distribution networks,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 5524-5535, Sept. 2019. [Baidu Scholar

24

Y. Xiang, J. Liu, W. Yang et al., “Active energy management strategies for active distribution system,” Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 533-543, Dec. 2015. [Baidu Scholar

25

A. Rajaei, S. Fattaheian-Dehkordi, M. Fotuhi-Firuzabad et al., “Developing a distributed robust energy management framework for active distribution systems,” IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1891-1902, Oct. 2021. [Baidu Scholar

26

I. Song, S. Yun, S. Kwon et al., “Design of smart distribution management system for obtaining real-time security analysis and predictive operation in Korea,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 375-382, Mar. 2013. [Baidu Scholar

27

A. P. S. Meliopoulos, E. Polymeneas, and Z. Tan, “Advanced distribution management system,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 2109-2117, Dec. 2013. [Baidu Scholar

28

Y. Fujimoto, H. Kikusato, S. Yoshizawa et al., “Distributed energy management for comprehensive utilization of residential photovoltaic outputs,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1216-1227, Mar. 2018. [Baidu Scholar

29

Schneider Electric SA. (2021, Oct.). Available: https://www.se.com/ [Baidu Scholar

tion-management-system-adms/ [Baidu Scholar

30

W. Lu, Y. Zhao, W. Li et al., “Design and application of microgrid operation control system based on IEC 61850,” Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 256-263, Sept. 2014. [Baidu Scholar

31

X. Zhang, B. Zhao, P. Li et al., “Distributed generator self-organized network strategy applied to microgrid service restoration,” Automation of Electric Power Systems, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 179-184, May 2015. [Baidu Scholar

32

W. Zheng, W. Wu, B. Zhang et al., “A fully distributed reactive power optimization and control method for active distribution networks,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol.7, no.2, pp.1021-1033, Feb. 2016. [Baidu Scholar

33

F. Pilo, A. Keane, L. Ochoa et al., “State-of-the-art techniques and challenges ahead for distributed generation planning and optimization,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 1493-1502, May 2013. [Baidu Scholar

34

M. Rodríguez-Montañés, J. A. Rosendo-Macías, and A. Gómez-Expósito et al., “Algebraic framework for outage information management in distribution networks,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 6806-6815, Nov. 2018. [Baidu Scholar

35

S. Chatzivasileiadis, M. Bonvini, J. Matanza et al., “Cyber-physical modeling of distributed resources for distribution system operations,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 104, no. 4, pp. 789-806, Apr. 2016. [Baidu Scholar

36

S. Wang and W. Wu, “Aggregate flexibility of virtual power plants with temporal coupling constraints,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 5043-5051, Nov. 2021. [Baidu Scholar

37

W. Wu, T. Xu, T. Zhu et al., “Coordinated optimal dispatch of virtual power plants in unbalanced active distribution networks,” IET Generation Transmission & Distribution, vol. 14, no. 8, pp.1430-1437, Jan. 2020. [Baidu Scholar

38

Z. Yi, Y. Xu, and W. Wu, “Market clearing strategy for distribution system considering multiple power commodities offered by virtual power plant,” Automation of Electric Power Systems, vol. 44, no. 22, pp. 143-151, Nov. 2019. [Baidu Scholar

39

Y. Ju, W Wu, F. Ge et al., “Fast decoupled state estimation for distribution network considering branch ampere measurements,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 6338-6347, Nov. 2018. [Baidu Scholar

40

Y. Ju, W. Wu, B. Zhang et al., “An extension of FBS three-phase power flow for handling PV nodes in active distribution network,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1547-1555, Jul. 2014. [Baidu Scholar

41

T. Xu and W. Wu, “Accelerated ADMM-based fully distributed inverter-based volt/var control strategy for active distribution networks,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 7532-7543, Dec. 2020. [Baidu Scholar

42

Z. Wang and W. Wu, “Coordinated control method for DFIG-based wind farm to provide primary frequency regulation service,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 2644-2659, May 2018. [Baidu Scholar

43

Y. Yang and W. Wu, “A distributionally robust optimization model for real-time power dispatch in distribution networks,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 3743-3752, Jul. 2019. [Baidu Scholar

44

X. Chen, W. Wu, and B. Zhang, “Robust restoration method for active distribution networks,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 4005-4015, Sept. 2016. [Baidu Scholar

45

C. Lin, W. Wu, and M. Shahidehpour, “Decentralized AC optimal power flow for integrated transmission and distribution grids,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 2531-2540, May 2020. [Baidu Scholar

46

C. Lin, W. Wu, X. Chen et al., “Decentralized dynamic economic dispatch for integrated transmission and active distribution networks using multi-parametric programming,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 4983-4993, Sept. 2018. [Baidu Scholar

47

Y. Zhang, W. Yi, Q. Fan et al., “Distribution network fault analysis scheme based on dispatching operation management system,” Automation of Electric Power Systems, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 220-225, Jan. 2015. [Baidu Scholar

48

M. M. Pramod and D. C. Richard, “Minimizing user interaction in energy management systems: task adaptive visualization,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1607-1612, Aug. 1996. [Baidu Scholar

49

Y. Sun, W. Wu, H. Wu et al., “A simulation and training system for active distribution network,” in Proceedings of IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Asia 2012, Tianjin, China, Mar. 2012, pp. 1-6. [Baidu Scholar

50

J. Hu, J. Wu, X. Ai et al., “Coordinated energy management of prosumers in a distribution system considering network congestion,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 468-478, Jan. 2021. [Baidu Scholar

51

X. Yang, C. Xu, H. He et al., “Flexibility provisions in active distribution networks with uncertainties,” IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 553-567, Jan. 2021. [Baidu Scholar

52

H. Wang, S. Wang, Z. Pan et al., “Optimized dispatching method for flexibility improvement of distribution network with high-penetration distribution generation,” Automation of Electric Power Systems, vol. 42, no. 15, pp. 86-93, Aug. 2018. [Baidu Scholar

53

H. Liu and W. Wu, “Online multi-agent reinforcement learning for decentralized inverter-based volt-var control,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 2980-2990, Jul. 2021. [Baidu Scholar

54

H. Liu and W. Wu, “Two-stage deep reinforcement learning for inverter-based volt-var control in active distribution networks,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 2037-2047, May 2021. [Baidu Scholar

55

T. Xu, W. Wu, Y. Hong et al., “Data-driven inverter-based Volt/Var control for partially observable distribution networks,” CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems, doi: 10.17775/CSEEJPES.2020.05920 [Baidu Scholar